Hair is a human attribute that involves aspects of self-image, identity, ethnicity, and health, among others. Therefore, it is not surprising that disorders that cause alopecia can alter self-perception and psychosocial interactions .
Alopecias can be classified as scarring (cicatricial) and nonscarring. Scarring alopecias are divided into 2 groups: primary (PSA) and secondary. PSAs are uncommon, but not rare, heterogeneous group of disorders characterized clinically by the lack of follicular ostia and histopathologically by the replacement of hair follicle structures by fibrous tissue, which makes this condition irreversible. From the pathophysiological point of view, the scarring area constitutes the end of reparative fibrosis, with permanent destruction of the preexisting tissue [2,3,4].
In PSAs, the hair follicle is the main target of the inflammatory process, which can be microscopically observed as a preferential destruction of the follicular epithelium and/or adventitial dermis, with a relative preservation of the interfollicular reticular dermis [5,6]. This group of alopecias includes the following clinical entities: chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE), lichen planopilaris (LPP), classic pseudopelade of Brocq (PB), folliculitis decalvans (FD), and dissecting folliculitis among others (Table 1). The term secondary scarring alopecia refers to when the destruction of the hair follicle is not the primary pathological event, and the condition is rather caused by exogenous factors such as trauma (e.g., burns, radiation, traction) or endogenous infiltrative and inflammatory processes (e.g., sarcoidosis, pemphigus vulgaris, and scleroderma)
here are currently various PSA classifications, but the most accepted is the one proposed by the North American Hair Research Society (NAHRS) , whose last revision was in 2003. This classification divides PSAs into 2 large groups based on the dominant type of inflammatory cell infiltrate. This concept had already been suggested by other authors earlier, but it was improved by this work group, who also added the lymphocytic and neutrophil-associated subgroups, as well as mixed (such as acne keloidalis) and nonspecific idiopathic scarring alopecias with inconclusive clinical and histological findings, most of which probably correspond to the final stage of other groups.
In the authors’ experience, PSAs can represent a true clinical challenge when clinical-pathological correlation is difficult to assess, which more commonly occurs during late and advanced stages. This makes histopathological diagnosis more difficult because the main classification criterion (the type of inflammatory infiltrate) might be impossible to assess. In these cases, additional studies such as direct immunofluorescence (DIF) can be useful. Reference sources are limited with respect to their true epidemiology, and randomized, double-blind clinical trials regarding treatment are currently lacking; consequently, therapy is mostly based on case series and the clinicians’ personal experience.
Materials and Methods
In order to obtain new clinical and pathological knowledge about PSAs, we decided to study the epidemiologic, demographic, clinical, and histological characteristics (classified in agreement with the NAHRS) of PSAs cases diagnosed over a 7-year period, at the Department of Dermatology of Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. We also evaluated the therapies used in each case, their clinical evolution, and the correlation of these results with the predominant type of inflammatory infiltrate on histopathology.
The first step included reviewing all the diagnoses of scalp biopsies, and searching the histopathological database of our patients, using the names of the PSA clinical entities according to the NAHRS classification, (such as LPP dissecting folliculitis, frontal fibrosing alopecia [FFA], etc.) between 2006 and 2012. We included only cases of PSA subtypes as a diagnosis, and for which there was access to the clinical history and histological findings. Collected data included age at diagnosis, sex, ethnic group, clinical pattern, predominant histological infiltrate, DIF result (if available), final clinical diagnosis, time of onset before diagnosis, treatments used, and clinical evolution. The final clinical diagnosis was based on clinical-pathological correlation. Exclusion criteria were diagnoses of secondary scarring alopecia (e.g., tumors, infections, traumas, sarcoidosis, etc.), scarring alopecia outside of the scalp, and lack of access to the clinical history.
A total of 1,085 cases were found during the search for general scalp biopsies and 72 biopsies with the diagnosis of PSA. The most frequent type of predominant inflammatory infiltrate was lymphocytic (31 cases), followed by absent or nonspecific inflammatory infiltrate (30 cases), neutrophil-associated (8 cases), and other/mixed type (2 granulomatous, 1 plasmatic). The ratio of neutrophilic scarring alopecia (NSA) to lymphocytic scarring alopecia (LSA) was 1:4 (Fig. 1, 2).
The ethnic groups were distributed as follows: 93% European-Caucasian, 5% Latin-American, 1% oriental and 1% African-American. Of the 72 cases, 21 (29%) were males and 51 (71%) were females, with a mean age of 51 ± 6 years. Both the LSA and NSA types tended to affect women with a mean age of 60 and 47 years, respectively. The mean onset time prior to diagnosis was 1.71 years, with the time being longer for LSAs than NSAs (1.95 vs. 1.11 years, respectively).
The most frequent clinical pattern was the follicular pattern (20 cases), followed by 18 cases with a single large patch, 13 cases with multiple patches, 7 cases with marginal pattern, 6 cases with a “footprints in the snow” pattern, 5 cases with FD pattern and 3 cases with acne keloidalis pattern (Fig. 3, 4).
According to the time of onset, 8 cases had an acute onset and 31 a subacute onset; 33 presented a chronic subclinical form. The most frequent type was acute-subacute onset in the NSAs and subacute-subclinical in the LSAs. In cases in which the infiltrate was slight or absent, with a predominance of scar tissue, the type was mainly subclinical(Fig. 5).
The most frequent form of evolution was the stable form presented in 44 cases, followed by the slowly progressive form in 18 cases. In a lower proportion, there were 8 cases of acute outbreaks and 3 cases of subacute outbreaks. By correlating with the type of inflammatory infiltrate, the most frequent form of progression in LSA was the stable, while in NSA it was the acute outbreak type (Fig. 6). The correlation between the type of inflammatory infiltrate and the clinical pattern was heterogeneous and not very specific, more commonly in the lymphocytic forms (Table 2).
A total of 48 DIF studies were performed, mostly because of clinical suspicion of LE or LPP, including the FFA type. Only 18 were positive, 10 suggestive of LE, and 8 suggestive of LPP. In 10 of these positive cases, histopathology was inconclusive.
The most frequent final diagnoses were LPP and its variant FFA (24 and 7 cases, respectively). These were followed by LE (13 cases), 20 cases of nonspecific cicatricial alopecia (central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, PB), 5 cases of FD, and 3 cases of acne keloidalis (Fig. 7).
The treatments used for these entities were multiple and heterogeneous, depending on whether the patient had clinical activity (Fig. 8). Treatment response was evaluated subjectively according to overall physician and patient assessments with a follow-up of at least 1 year in all the cases. Patients with LSA were offered a large variety of treatments, with the most used being potent topical or intralesional corticosteroids in combination with 5% minoxidil solution, systemic corticosteroids, and antimalarials (hydroxychloroquine). Topical corticosteroids were the first line of treatment in almost all cases. However, they were frequently combined with systemic therapies. Intralesional corticosteroids (triamcinolone acetonide 10-30 mg/session) were applied every 1-2 months in severe cases. For nonresponders or rapidly progressing cases, oral corticosteroids (prednisone or deflazacort) were administered to suppress the acute inflammatory response, and then they were gradually withdrawn. As for the use of antimalarials (specifically hydroxychloroquine), they were used in our center as the first line of therapy in cases with a subclinical onset and/or slowly progressive course, at dosages of 200-400 mg/day. The majority of patients were prescribed 5% minoxidil (together with topical or intralesional corticosteroids), more commonly during periods of remission.
For NSA cases, most common treatments included antibiotics (systemic and topical), oral isotretinoin, and corticosteroids (systemic and topical) in combination with 5% minoxidil. As a first-line treatment, a wide spectrum of systemic antibiotics with both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, such as doxycycline, minocycline, erythromycin and azithromycin, at variable dosages were used. The mean time of use of systemic antibiotics was 6 months (range, 2-12 months); however, since there was a high recurrence rate in the majority of cases when treatment was stopped, new therapeutic cycles were required. As another treatment option, isotretinoin was used in 3 cases at dosages commonly used in acne, with significant response, but with recurrences after drug suspension.
The epidemiology of PSAs in the general population is unknown. There are 2 retrospective studies that have been carried out in clinical centers specializing in hair research, in which the estimated prevalence was 3.2% in one center and 7.3% in the other [2,3]. In our study, of the total scalp biopsies, PSAs corresponded to 6.6% of cases, so our results fell within this range. If we had considered all clinical consultations for disorders that affect the scalp, this number would probably be lower. A considerable number of PSA cases are not biopsied because they are diagnosed based on the clinical picture alone. The greater prevalence of these entities in females agrees with our results. A possible reason for this is that women are more likely to consult for hair diseases due to the aesthetic implications they involve. The ratio of LSA to NSA of 4:1 is what we constantly found in the series reviewed .
There are few data in the literature about the origin of PSAs. In the majority of PSA cases, histopathology reveals inflammation affecting the upper section of the hair follicle. This would explain why the process is irreversible, as this is the spot where stem cells are located, at the level of the bulge (where the hair erector muscle is inserted), below the infundibulum. The location of this inflammatory response is sometimes the result of antigenic stimulation of the Langerhans cells that are mostly found at the infundibulum and in lower numbers in the isthmus. Examples of these possible antigenic stimuli would be ultraviolet light in the case of LE, certain drugs in the case of LPP and Staphylococcus aureus in the case of FD. New knowledge about PSA origin proposes that a loss in the immune protection of the hair bulb stem cells might be involved [5,9], as well as a dysfunction in stem cell self-perpetuation, increased autoimmunity by proinflammatory cytokines, and genetic/environmental predisposition [10,11,12]. Recent data also suggest an association between lipid metabolism alteration and PSA development, in which dysfunction of the sebaceous glands could play an important role in its pathogenesis. Independent of the initial event, obliteration or permanent functional alteration of the crucial elements for follicular reconstitution causes permanent baldness [13,14,15,16,17].
In our study, we found 72 biopsied cases of PSA in a 7-year period, which is lower than the number found in similar studies in even shorter periods. An explanation for this could lie partially in the fact that many diagnoses are made clinically in agreement with patient history and clinical findings; this is the case of cutaneous LE, in which biopsy is often omitted for diagnosis in the context of a patient diagnosed with known systemic and/or cutaneous lupus and compatible clinical findings. The same is true with FFA, which can be diagnosed without need for a biopsy because of its typical clinical picture. Another explanation is that, since our Department is a hair research center of reference, patients commonly arrive from other services, with previously performed biopsies, and they are consequently not included in the database.
With respect to final clinical diagnoses, the most frequent was LPP and its frontal fibrosing variant (43%), followed by nonspecific scarring alopecia (28%), LE (18%), FD (7%), and acne keloidalis (4%). It should be emphasized that it is impossible to perform a precise diagnosis in almost a third of the patients, which represents a true diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for both dermatologists and patients [2,18]. These numbers are similar to those in recent studies, which highlight the importance to perform biopsies at the initial stages to achieve a more accurate management and prognosis. In the study by Whiting , nonspecific alopecias were the most frequent forms (40.6%), followed by LPP, (12.6%) and FD (11.2%). In the series described by Tan et al. , discoid LE was the most common diagnosis, with 33.9%, followed by pseudopelade (nonspecific alopecia), with 24.1%, and, in the third place, LPP (22.3%). These discrepancies in the various series are probably due to differences in patient demographics and the pathological clinical criteria for diagnosis of pseudopelade/nonspecific alopecia. It is important to mention that diagnosis of PSAs is not a merely academic exercise, and it should be done in a prompt and accurate manner, given that early treatment of the inflammatory component can prevent the course of the disease, and avoid progression to fibrosis (which is irreversible).
Taking a correct scalp biopsy is crucial for diagnosing PSAs. Consequently, it should be performed at the initial presentation of the disorder, or shortly afterwards, taking a sample from the active (inflamed) borders of the affected area; this increases the possibility of finding more inflammatory infiltrate than fibrosis, therefore establishing a more accurate diagnosis and initiating proper and early treatment to achieve a better response. However, histopathology might not be diagnostic if the biopsy is taken from the incorrect site. This is especially relevant in PSAs since the disorder can be focal and the activity might be hard to see with the naked eye [10,19,20,21]. For these reasons, we would like to emphasize the importance of dermoscopy in studying scalp pathology, in addition to allowing the physician to examine the morphology of PSAs macro- and microscopically. It also makes possible to identify subtle clinical changes, confirm the naked-eye diagnoses, monitor the treatment and guide the scalp biopsy for optimum results. This last usefulness was confirmed by Miteva and Tosti  in a study with 80 patients with PSA in which the biopsies were selected based on the dermoscopy findings, reaching a definitive diagnosis in 95% of the cases; it is a quick, accurate method, even for identifying individually affected follicles in focal PSA or in early stages.
In normal clinical practice, we observe 2 distinct clinical patterns of presentation for scarring alopecia. The first, called “footprints in the snow,” is characterized by multiple irregular patches; the second, called “great patch,” corresponds to a large central patch of scarring alopecia surrounded by various smaller similar patches in the form of cicatricial satellitosis scarring. If we analyze other forms of clinical presentations of scarring alopecia, we can see that there are characteristic patterns, which we could call specific patterns: marginal (associated with FFA and traction alopecia), follicular (associated with LPP, FD, alopecia parvimaculata, acne necrotica), tufted pattern (folliculitis in tufts, acne keloidalis nuchae type), abscessing inflammatory pattern (erosive pustular scalp dermatosis, perifolliculitis capitis abscedens et suffodiens), and diffuse pattern (acute LPP, “red scalp” syndrome) .
In our series, the most frequent clinical patterns in LSAs were follicular and multiple patches, which coincides with the pattern described as characteristic of LPP. This was followed by the great central patch pattern, which fundamentally corresponded to LE, normally initiating as a single patch that gradually expanded. In the case of nonspecific alopecias, the 2 main patterns were the follicular and large single patch; this could be explained by the likelihood of final or inactive stages of some types of LSAs. It should be emphasized that clinical cases with the “footprints in the snow” pattern that are described as characteristic of the classic PB were finally classified as LPP or LE using other complementary study techniques (e.g., DIF); this would support the belief that this entity is probably not an entity in itself, but rather a final process of another. In the NSAs, the most frequent clinical pattern was FD, characterized by pustules in the follicular areas and sometimes associated with follicles in tufts; however, there were also 3 cases that presented as a large central patch. From these results, we can conclude that the clinical pattern can allow us to infer the type of inflammatory infiltrate of PSAs, but that it does not contribute to making an etiological diagnosis.
Predominantly Lymphocytic Scarring Alopecias
In our study, LPP and its frontal fibrosing variant were the most frequent clinical diagnoses in the LSAs group, followed by cutaneous LE. This contrasts with reports from other case series in which LE is the most predominant. This difference could be influenced by discrepancies in clinical and pathological diagnostic criteria, especially in the case of the classic PB. In addition, we believe that the frequency of LE alopecia is underestimated, probably because a considerable number of cases of scarring alopecia due to LE in our center are diagnosed without histological confirmation as they usually occur in the context of patients with known history of LE. In our series, both LPP and LE affected more commonly adult middle-aged females, with similar onset ages for both entities. The exception was the frontal fibrosing variant, which affected mainly older women. In many of the cases, skin biopsy was performed to differentiate between the 2 entities (LE vs. LPP), adding DIF as a complementary diagnostic technique. When to use DIF to differentiate between these 2 entities is not well established. Some authors propose that it should always be performed to diagnose these entities accurately, while others support considering this technique only when the routine histopathological study is inconclusive. The most characteristic DIF pattern for LPP consists of deposits of globular IgM bodies (colloid bodies) next to the follicular epithelium or in the dermal-epidermal junction, and dense fibrin deposits in the dermal-epidermal junction. The DIF for LE commonly shows granular or band-like deposits of immunoglobulins (IgG and IgM) and C3 in the dermal-epidermal junction, with IgA presence being rare. In the majority of the series, routine histology is usually sufficient for diagnosis, with only 6% of LPP and 7% of LE cases being diagnosed exclusively with DIF. The sensitivity of this technique for LPP is 34%, and the specificity is 95%; for LE, DIF sensitivity is reported as 83% and specificity, 93% (the percentage of positivity ranges between 63 and 100% according to the different reports) [23,24]. In our series, of 48 DIF studies performed, only 18 were positive and, from these, the diagnosis was made solely based on DIF results in only 10 cases due to the fact that histopathology was doubtful or nonspecific. We can thus say that DIF is a valuable tool for diagnosing and/or differentiating various types of PSAs, especially LE, but that its performance for diagnosis of LPP is poor. Consequently, we consider that using this method routinely in all cases of scarring alopecia is unjustified, and it should be reserved only for doubtful or inconclusive cases.
It should be emphasized that in our series we found no cases of classic PB despite having initial suspicion in some patients that presented the characteristic “footprints in the snow” pattern. This entity was originally described in 1888 as a noninflammatory progressive scarring alopecia of unknown origin, characterized by patches tending to coalesce in large irregular patches with polycyclic borders . Although some authors still consider it to be a separate entity, its existence as such is currently doubted by many [26,27,28,29]. Although there are multiple theories about the true nature of PB, the dermatologists that focus on the subject currently tend to consider it not as a nonspecific clinical-pathological entity, but instead, as a variant of some types of PSAs [30,31,32,33,34,35], or, alternatively, as a final atrophic stage of scarring alopecias, such as LE, LPP, or FD [36,37]. At present, the majority of idiopathic noninflammatory scarring alopecia cases are diagnosed as nonspecific scarring alopecia or pseudopelade, and the eponym Brocq is rarely used. However, several authors have proposed to exclude completely the term pseudopelade to avoid confusion [19,20,38]. In our series, the results agree with this theory: the 6 cases initially suspected of being PB due to clinical picture and history were finally classified as another entity due to the histology and DIF results. Other authors such as Amato et al.  have had similar results; those authors found that 66% of the cases initially catalogued as PB ended up being LPP or LE.
The objective of PSA treatment is to stop the scarring process, reduce the follicular inflammation and end the irreversible destruction of the follicle. It is important to know that although some regrowth may rarely occur, it is not the aim of treatment, and goals must be discussed with the patients so that their expectations are realistic . However, treatment for all the types of PSA can be very difficult because there are no consistent markers to measure the progress of the disorder . Therapy is based on disorder severity and patient tolerance to treatment. In our department, for LSAs we routinely use class I potent topical corticosteroids (and sometimes intralesional) in all active cases to reduce the inflammation and thus reduce systemic secondary effects as much as possible. The most frequently seen secondary effect was transitory cutaneous atrophy. Systemic agents are reserved as a second option when there is no response to topical/intralesional agents, generally after 8 weeks. However, we use systemic corticosteroids for short time periods for cases with extremely acute inflammation. We normally use hydroxychloroquine for cases with slow progression and subclinical inflammation, and also as an attempt to reduce severe outbreaks in both LPP and LE cases. Clinical improvement is commonly observed after 4-8 weeks, while the maximum therapeutic effect is not seen until after several months. Although we have no experience in combining different antimalarials, such use is described in the literature ; it would have a synergic effect, for cases that do not respond to the full hydroxychloroquine dosage (200-400 mg/day) for 3-6 months. Retinoids are generally used in patients presenting antimalarial resistance. Although there are studies supporting that the efficacy of acitretin is similar to that of hydroxychloroquine, we prefer to use isotretinoin (at 1 mg/kg/day) as the first option because the likelihood of inducing telogen effluvium is much less than with acitretin. In addition, the half-life of isotretinoin is much shorter, and there is less risk of teratogenicity for women of childbearing age, which constitutes an important group of the patients with LE. With respect to topical minoxidil, there is no evidence of its efficacy in PSA, nor is the exact mechanism by which it would act in this type of pathologies known. Nonetheless, in our experience, these patients benefit from its continued use; this may be associated with a hair regrowth of the remaining follicles , or, in some cases, this is probably due to the presence of a certain degree of concomitant androgenetic alopecia. Other authors also agree that using a topical 5% minoxidil solution gives good results. In severe and more extensive cases, camouflage options should be provided .
Pseudopelade or Nonspecific Scarring Alopecia
The term pseudopelade implies a nonspecific scarring alopecia, which could be a much more comprehensible term. The scarring is thought to be the result of an autoimmune process. In general, there is an insidious increase in this type of scarring process that apparently is noninflammatory . This phenomenon is due to the fact that many entities causing scarring alopecia gradually “burn out” and become indistinguishable from others. The final shared result is an irregular scar in the scalp without any distinguishable clinical or histological characteristics. Correct diagnosis could be suggested by the initial clinical or histological characteristics, but this information is often unavailable .
As our results show, nonspecific scarring alopecia is not rare. In our series, it was the second most common type, if we consider it as an individual entity, mainly affecting females, perhaps a bit younger than the sample mean. In the majority of our cases, the bald patches were found in the vertex, though, any site can be affected. Some lesions were circular or oval, while others tended to coalesce and form irregular patches. Clinically they presented as smooth, flat, skin-colored lesions, somewhat atrophic, lacking clinical evidence of activity in both the center and peripheral areas. In our series, the clinical presentation of these patients was mainly subclinical and the evolution predominantly slow and progressive. However, according to other series described in the literature, the course can be extremely varied, with some cases extending quickly and evolving to complete baldness in a few years . In the majority of the cases, histology reveals an already advanced scarring process with limited inflammatory infiltrate and, even when an inflammatory component can sometimes be seen, it is totally nonspecific or insufficient for diagnosis. Within the differential diagnoses, LE, LPP, FD, and other uncommon causes of scarring alopecia are included. Some authors state that 90% of these pseudopelade cases are the result of LPP, although others limit this percentage to only 15% [2,3,20,30]. Little has been described regarding treatment for this entity. In our experience, for stable lesions, therapeutic abstinence and observation or corrective surgery can be chosen. However, in progressive cases, even if the progression is slow, we propose to use potent topical corticosteroids alone or associated with 5% minoxidil. Treatments with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressant agents are generally of limited efficacy.
Neutrophilic Scarring Alopecias
The causes of NSA and mixed types include FD, acne keloidalis, dissecting folliculitis, acne necrotica, and tufted folliculitis . In our study, we found 8 NSAs and 3 mixed types. Of the NSA cases, 5 were finally diagnosed as FD and the 3 mixed types, as acne keloidalis. There were 3 cases in which diagnosis was nonspecific scarring alopecia.
The pathogenesis of NSAs is unknown. It is postulated that the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus is involved, since it is often cultured in pustules. However, it is unclear whether this is a primary or secondary process. Bacterial superantigens or defects in cellular immunity are thought to play a role in NSA pathogenesis [41,42]. Although the literature describes this type of alopecia as predominating in males, in our series it appeared more often in females (5 cases in women and 3 in men). The affected areas may vary, but in our experience NSAs usually affect the vertex and parietal-occipital areas, which agrees with other authors’ findings. The most common theory at present is that FD, dissecting cellulitis, and folliculitis keloidalis could all represent entities of the same disorder, and clinical manifestations might be different between them, depending on the differences in follicle anatomy and on host immune response. As recently discussed by other authors , we also agree that tufted folliculitis (described in the majority of our patients with NSA but also in a few LSA cases) corresponds to a secondary phenomenon that can occur in various types of inflammatory scalp pathology, rather than to a finding of a specific entity. Most of our NSAs were diagnosed in an acute inflammation stage, but it is worth noting that in some cases it is possible to find a neutrophilic infiltrate in the biopsy even in the final stages (without activity).
FD is an entity characterized by the presence of scalp folliculitis that extends progressively, leaving a scarring alopecia [18,40]. Usually affecting adults, FD is characterized by pustules that surround multiple expanding alopecic patches. The lesions generally tend to coalesce to form a single large patch in the vertex . It can sometimes affect the beard, axillae, pubis, and inner thighs . It usually lasts a long time and it is progressive, with multiple acute outbreaks, as reflected in our results. The area affected can sometimes even continue expanding after the pustules have disappeared .
Treatment for NSAs is often nonsatisfactory. There is usually a high rate of recurrence after treatment, with acute outbreaks of the disorder. Although it is suspected that pathogenesis involves a defect in the immune system response, we consider that its study is rarely useful or profitable. In agreement with previous recommendations in the literature, our first therapeutic alternative is the combination of systemic antibiotics and potent topical corticosteroids. In our series, the antibiotics used most were doxycycline, minocycline, erythromycin, and azithromycin. However, wide-spectrum cephalosporins and the combination of rifampicin with clindamycin or sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim are reported to be useful. Treatment is usually required for several months, and its efficacy probably involves both the antimicrobial and the anti-inflammatory effects of these antibiotics. Treatment with topical antibiotics such as erythromycin, fusidic acid, or mupirocin can also be attempted. Although the effectiveness of isotretinoin has been reported, in our experience it is temporary. As with antibiotics, it is capable of inducing temporary remission in all the cases treated and can probably maintain a longer disease-free period than antibiotics. For mild, poorly defined lesions, surgical removal of the scarring area is accepted as a form of treatment, but we have no experience in the subject. Other therapeutic options described in the literature with a degree of success are the use of shampoos with povidone iodine and zinc sulphate at 400 mg/day.
The PSAs are trichological emergencies. To reach an accurate diagnosis, proper clinical-pathological correlation is required. The great variability in the clinical presentation of PSAs makes their diagnosis and treatment a true challenge for the dermatologist. The entity LSA is the most frequent histological type, with LPP and its variant FFA being the most diagnosed disorders. Aggressive therapy is often needed to avoid progression of the disorder. The therapeutic alternatives available will sometimes depend on the type of histological infiltrate; both topical and systemic treatments are valid.
Scarring alopecias can be hard to diagnose. Biopsy should be performed during the initial stages of the disorder in order to make a more accurate diagnosis. Clinical presentation can sometimes be the decisive factor in making a diagnosis. A great number of cases end up being classified as nonspecific scarring alopecia and are currently called pseudopelade.
Characteristic clinical and pathological findings sometimes allow us to make a precise diagnosis. However, diagnostic certainty is often hard to achieve and reflects the limits of current knowledge of these disorders.
The fact that an important number of our patients were finally classified as having nonspecific scarring alopecias strengthens the importance of early referral of these patients for dermatological assessment to receive proper treatment.
Finally, appropriate patient counselling, support measures from other health professionals as clinical psychologist and beauticians and camouflage measures as reconstructive hair fibers and prostheses should be provided in order to benefit the quality of life of those patients. Patients with PSAs need the care of dermatologists specializing in hair disorders to help them in all their clinical and personal concerns.
For more information about cicatricial alopecia, visit carfintl.org